Gingrich acknowledged that this system left the country unprepared for independence. But he also understated the extent to which that failure doomed the country. He wrote in his conclusion, "If the Congo was not the model colony Belgian publicists pretended, neither was it the disaster news reports from to suggested.
Yes it was. This would have been obvious when Gingrich wrote in and it is obvious today. What is now called the Democratic Republic of Congo has never been well governed by an effective leader who had full control over the territory. Gingrich wrote this as the Black Consciousness and Black Power movements were approaching their pinnacles. It was most decidedly not the time to be arguing that white European masters did a swell job ruling black Africans through a system that ensured that most Congolese would never get a real education.
Heaven forbid that any of us be judged by our dissertations. The last stage of earning a PhD is a miserable process, fraught with exhaustion, self-doubt, and the abuse of caffeine. But writing a dissertation is also a process of great intellectual stimulation and freedom. For the right person, digging up source materials from archives or interviews to construct an evidence-based argument no one has ever made before can be exhilarating and provide a sense of accomplishment like few others.
What is more, in my experience in academic life, it is unusual for someone to write an MA thesis in a field like How do i do my homework Science. Can you tell me where I can find some information about his graduate work at Columbia? I remember Bedau from Reed College around At one point he was one of the few 2 or 3 faculty members to come out publicly against the Vietnam war. Contrary to its reputation, Reed discourages faculty political involvement, and Bedau may have left for that reason.
He did write a senior paper for one course, but it was not filed with the university and neither Obama nor the teacher of the class has a copy. It was just an ambition undergrad paper. I have no proof, but I believe a constributing factor in his not getting tenure was his general disinterest in doing his job. In short, he lacked discipline and he lacked interest in his discipline. The relatively few university libraries with which I am reasonably familiar do not, as far as I know, allow one to download an unpublished dissertation listed in their catalogs.
I am therefore a bit surprised that you were able to download the buy resume for writing rated from the Tulane website with the help, as you say, of the Duke librarian. Either Tulane is unusual in this respect or I am wrong about what the standard procedures are for unpublished dissertations. I have no opinion on Gingrich one way or the other not being a US citizen I can afford to ignore him.
The language used or conclusions reached are not out of line with other academic publications of the time. LFC, I do not have any experience trying to download dissertations, so I cannot say whether the Tulane practice is unusual, but the reference librarian at Duke did not comment on it, so I assumed it was now a pretty standard thing.
The vulgar comment was uncalled for. I was incorrect about the MA thesis, even though the site referenced a Time mag article. Hmm, were someone to upload my doctoral dissertation to Scribd without my permission, as if it were de facto public property, I think I would be extremely pissed. Lots of us have written dissertations that, at later stages of our careers, we are not especially fond of. As Dr. But taking it out of context by posting on Scribd for the internets to point and laugh at is dirty pool, I would think.
I benefit from it. Perhaps you might consider passing along your concerns to the Tulane Library in an official complaint. So, my guess is that the diss. My second guess is, he is, as a dishonest lout, concerned that there just might be some long-forgotten plagiarizing within. As for the persistence of juvenalia, well, Gingo qua Gingo is gleeful when calling out his opponents on statements they may have made, or may not have made as, for example, pre-schoolers.
And he holds them to those statements. Also, he speaks quite proudly of his earlier works, as in, "You ought to purchase my book on. Finally, dissertations as "juvenalia"? Oh really? Universities, however, seem to still believe that dissertations are major writings. Could you get behind that? Of course you are correct in an important sense: Oh, and why do you believe his dissertation would be laughed at if released into the wilds of the Internet?
I believe it would more likely be the source of true Homeric sadness. Has that been revised?! Let us now speak frankly of frankly speaking, Part One: By the way, he received an "A" in the course, and the paper was discarded by the professor years ago, and Obama did not himself keep a copy. Perhaps you kept all your high school term papers? If so, please submit them for analysis since you may yet become President, particularly in this era where the likes of Gingo, Perry, and Bachmann are in the running.
Your comments about his presidency of Harvard Law Review shows your misunderstanding of law reviews, in general, and Harvard aka, "the Law School"in particular. Also, it is not unusual or shame-worthy for a law review editor-in-chief to choose not write an article for the review. As for Obama, he had been awarded a book contract in his second year, and that took precedence.
There, he was for all that time both adjunct and a lecturer. He was not on a tenure-track. Adjuncts, though considered by U of CLS to be "professors," are not required to write law review articles. Here are the facts, courtesy of U. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track.
The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama good persuasive paper topics invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.
Let us now speak frankly of frankly speaking. Part Two, thankfully, of only two parts: He introduced many bills.
Here are some of them: In addition, President Obama was then a freshman senator. You write: Gingrich has no "academic writing" whatever other than his dissertation. I suppose we might differ here, but having read some of his pulp fiction and nonfiction, I consider them a preposterous pile of undereducated, uninformed, and ego-maniacal bullshit. And so do most professional reviewers. As I say, perhaps we differ here. Can we agree to do so? But, here, may we also agree to disagree?
I feel quite saf in my belief that you have not the slightest idea of what you mean by "verb antecedent noun errors. Finally, through your baseless attacks on the President, you have proved you are, like Gingo, a slacker who, like most of your anti-Obama cabal, have no taste for real factual research, i.
I think that the Democratic party - primarily wimps who are afraid of the likes of you - has let you get away with it for too long. But not here, not now.
Hey, even you might agree with this: Ah, yes. I was thinking of "genatalia. Oh hell. I was thinking of "juvenalia," not "genitalia. Perhaps the most interesting thing about the year in which he finished his dissertation was that remaining embedded in university was, at that time, a good way to avoid the draft. What an unfounded comment.
I should know better! I actually think that Gingrich, however he bloviates, is often worth the time to pay attention, for several reasons.
I would like to read a critical examination of the policies he has proposed. And I would love a debate between Obama and Gingrich that did not degenerate in name-calling or bringing up an unchangeable past.
I also read him as outside of the Boehner box, as a former Speaker of the House in more cordial times. That means that I was 18 years old in I have a Ph. Never had anything to do with the colony, except that I escaped by three months being parachuted into Katanga. But this is what I remember: Flemish who did marvelous work. I remember Father Haazen who composed the Missa Luba. They got a holiday back home every 10 years. The rather cheesy movie "The nuns story" gives a rather accurate description - for all I know.
I volunteered to go to Congo for them, a plan that was wisely? We had a leader from Ruanda, Evarist Nunkinwanza certaily misspelledwho was incredibly popular and - I think - became a minister in independent Ruanda. Boehner, by contrast, is a political eunuch.
Have a look at his recent "brainstorm" to put kids to work, for pay, at public schools in "poor neighborhoods. Moreover, the janitorial staff that would be replaced by children would, of course, be unemployed, and their unions weakened. Hint, he does not care a whit. Having done no physical work for pay in his own life, he can sit back and imagine what work entails. For anyone to take advice about working from Newt is absurd; by most accounts even by his campaign staff, such ass it is he is a lazy bum of a guy who, without politics, would likely still be living at home and refusing to take out the garbage.
Stylistically, they are very different. The times -- the mid s -- were very different. More prosperous, for one thing. Most Speakers are bare-knuckle fighters in the political trenches. Boehner is not, because he cannot go bare knuckles against his own party. I think there are four or five levels of Newt Gingrich -- none of them that laudable, all of them interesting. The best thing, from my POV as a watcher who has no intention of voting for him, bournemouth university dissertation that he came up with the Contract for America and got some of it passed.
If we are largely academics, dishing on politicians, can we not take a slightly more "academic" or neutral point of view on this person? I am not an academic. For example, I recognize argument as not sloganeering. You understand little of congressional politics, history, or Gingo. I spent more than 30 years on Capitol Hill working among these folks in senipor positions. Gingrich was a failed Speaker in nearly any sense. Read the facts. Gingo will have no better chance, as candidate or president, influencing his own party today than Boehner does.
Gingo would have been flummoxed by the Tea party as well. Just look at what the GOP would enacvt into law if they had the Senate secure. Gingo is among the worst among them. It is utterly irrelevant how much one might have admired Gingo in the past.
Forgert the "Contract With America," it was all but uniformly rejected by the American public. If you support the goals of the GOP, then say so. Just do not come here defending the past of Gingo, an individual who is article review essay bad - worse - a human being than ever before.
Mike, I just salivate over such blindly obsessed liberals such as yourself. You let your ideology completely blind you from comparison. You state that every single Republican is stupid, it is what you insinuate, or state, but yet with absolutely not one shred of evidence, which has become quite a constancy with this president and his defenders you state him practically a genius.
Let me guess, you are going to reply and debate me stating you calling him a genius - go ahead. The satisfaction your musings cause me is reason itself to celebrate.
A debate, between "Gingo", nice name-calling, and the president, and your genius will prevail? Is he going to prove to "Gingo" how his trillion dollar porkulus bill "saved" our economy and created jobs, or just that it saved jobs. Saw how many great-paying jobs that created for so few rich people. They would actually probably fare much better under this arrangement. Or is he going to explain to "Gingo" how green energy is the way help with thesis statement the future, speaking of futurolgy, and that although "Gingo" [laugh-laugh] apparently cannot see into the future with his intellect, of course the president can?
Debate topic must: The shining, perfect, and inherently simple and transparent program. I think you will agree with me on this one, reason being I must be right is because he must be saving it for the debates. Oddly enough for a crowning achievement that will save our country, he has yet to talk about it or bring it up at all yet. I am sure he will discuss it at length in the Lincoln-style debates "Gingo" will challenge him with.
Of course. Nice article, i appreciate for putting this together! Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here. Keep it up MBA Dissertation. Thank you Dr. Wolff for creating this blog. Great discussion! Nice rebuttals Mike, keep up the good work! The tragic disaster of decolonization in the Congo, leading to the assassination of Lumumba, the protracted Congo Crisis ofand the rise of the kleptocrat Mobutu, was largely due to the lack of higher education opportunities for Congolese under the Belgians.
There were something like 6 Congolese including Lumumba who had the equivalent of post high school training in Try appointing ministers and a cabinet with no training. The Belgian policy of such restricted educational opportunities ensured an on-going European presence.
When Lumumba got rid of the Belgians, they with CIA help assassinated him, and dissolved his corpse in acid to prevent him from becoming a martyr. On the other hand, maybe if the newt had gotten tenure, the world would be a safer place. ALL of his subsequent published works have been "co-authored".
I am still amazed that anyone defends Newt at all, let alone as a potential President
Monitor Daily Phd Issue. A Congo Science Perspective.
September 16, By Laura Seay Guest blogger.