A number of SCNs are working together with publishers to help to showcase your work by sharing links to published journal articles on author profiles. We encourage authors to share their research responsibly on SCNs.
You can share your preprint or a link to your article. It provides 50 days free access to your newly-published article on ScienceDirect to anyone clicking on the link. We encourage you to share this link on social media. After 50 days the share link will still work but automatically revert to a link to your full text article.
You can also share your final published article immediately by publishing it open access. If you have chosen to publish your article open access, you can share according to the end user license selected: More information is available on our open access licenses page.
If your article has already been published as a subscription article, it may still be possible customized statistics paper make it open access up until 31 st January of the following year by paying the Article Publishing Charge APC associated with your journal. For example, if the article has a formal date of publication of Marchauthors are able to make their article open access up until the 31st January This cutoff date is necessary to uphold our no double dipping policy.
To request retrospective open access or for further details, please contact us. We are always looking for ways to improve customer experience on Elsevier. We would like to ask you for a moment of your time to fill in a short questionnaire, at the end of your visit. If you decide to participate, a new browser tab will open so you can complete the survey after you have completed your visit to this website.
Thanks in advance for your time. Skip to content. Search for books, journals or webpages All Webpages Books Journals. Sharing and promoting your article. You make use of services we offer — Sharelinks are a personal, customized short link that provides free access to your article for 50 days Responsible sharing in line with copyright enables publishers to sustain high quality journals and the services they provide to the research community.
Promote your article Now that your article is published, you can promote it to make a bigger impact with your research. Share your article Sharing research is an important part of the research process. Share Link To help you reach more readers, Elsevier will send you a Share Link when your article is published: Unless explicitly stated otherwise e. Without adding a reference at the end of this sentence, you suggest that this statement results from your research reported in the same article.
If this is not the case, you need to add the reference. Adding references where not needed and — even worse — not adding references where needed is bound human service research papers lead to confusion and misinterpretation of your statements.
Statements in a scientific article are intended to communicate knowledge and information. Good communication demands unambiguity, consistency tip six and objectivity. However, you might prefer subjective statements expressing personal biases, emotional involvement etc. Irrespective of the adjective, providing this type of subjective statement is not only imprecise and inappropriate but also creates a straight path to disagreement with reviewers and readers.
So, the research is complete and now you need to write it down and create figures. Reviewers or typesetters will correct that, right? No, not really. First, dumping a sloppy article in the inbox of an editor and reviewers is a strong expression of disrespect, especially for the voluntary work carried out by reviewers.
Their time is also precious, and they are not your spell checkers. The fastest way to lose the confidence of the editor, reviewers and readers in your work is to follow this tip. Finally, with or without the above-mentioned tips, you might reach the stage where the editor and reviewers decide your article has potential and you receive feedback from them. Sometimes, these comments are explicitly labelled as mandatory.
However, what you do with them is up to you. Less disrespectful, but equally detrimental to the quality of your article, is to provide an extensive response to the comments in the letter to the editor mcmaster biology thesis professors the reply to reviewers, but not include elements of this response in the text.
You would be wise to listen to them. His main areas of expertise are urban physics, wind engineering and sports aerodynamics. He has published articles in international peer-reviewed journals.
He has acted as a reviewer for more than 70 different ISI journals. He is currently supervising a team of 2 senior researchers, 28 PhD students and 2 MSc students. We are always looking for ways to improve customer experience on Elsevier. We would like to ask you for a moment of your time to fill in a short questionnaire, at the end of your visit.
If you decide to participate, a new browser tab will open so you can complete the survey after you have completed your visit to this website. Thanks in advance for your time.
Skip to content. Search for books, journals or webpages All Webpages Books Journals. Feature image: The Screamby Edvard Munch At a time when publication pressure and the quantity of publications are increasing, but the average quality of publications seems to be decreasing, guidance for early career researchers on how to write journal articles is increasingly relevant.
Refuse to read the previous literature published in your field Take the lazy route and plagiarize Omit key article components Disrespect previous publications Overestimate your contribution Excel in ambiguity and inconsistency Apply incorrect referencing of statements Prefer subjective over objective statements Give little care to grammar, spelling, figures and tables Ignore editor and reviewer comments 1.
Refuse to read the previous literature published in your field Literature study is the essential starting point of any worthy research activity, and should form the solid basis of every publication.
Take the lazy route and plagiarize As publication pressure builds and the deadline for your journal article is drawing near, why not take the easy road?
These are questions that editors and reviewers need your article to answer in a specific and logical order: Disrespect previous publications Respect is of the utmost importance in scientific research and academic publishing. Overestimate your contribution Good ingredients for a truly terrible article are dismissive statements about previous work done by others, incorrect and unjustified self-congratulations, lack of critical self-reflection — in short: Excel in ambiguity and inconsistency Try to make the interested reader clueless about what you are communicating by introducing ambiguity in your sentences and words.
Once production of your article has started, you can track the status of your article via Track Your Accepted Article. When authors co-submit and publish a data article in Data in Briefit appears on ScienceDirect linked to the original research article in this journal.
The guidelines have been updated in the guide for authors, for but a short overview, please see below:. Short Communications are short papers that present original and significant material for rapid dissemination.
For example, a Short Communication may focus on a particular aspect of a problem or a new finding that is expected to have a significant impact. Short articles include, but are not limited to: As Short Communications are expected to have higher than average impact on the field rather than report on incremental research, they will receive prioritized and rapid publication.
Short Communications are limited to words and are not subdivided. The paper should contain an abstract, main body and references, and contain no more than 6 figures or tables, combined. The abstract is limited to words. A guide to estimating paper length follows:. Short Communications will appear at the end of the topical sections in the journal table of contents.
In this Article: Summarizing a journal article is the process of presenting a focused overview of a completed research study that is short journal article in a peer-reviewed, scholarly source. Writing and summarizing a journal article is a common short journal article for college students and research assistants alike.
With a little practice, you can learn to read the article effectively with an eye for summary, plan a successful summary, and write it to completion. Try another answer Second, it is easier bibliography apa style write a summary if you identify the most crucial information before you begin skimming the article Pick another answer!
The conclusion usually restates the main argument, and it will tell you what the article contributes to the field.